Jonathan News
Edward Stourton or Jonathan Ross?
Who should be the Voice of Britain at the BBC?
Edward Stourton – presenter on Radio 4’s flagship news show Today, a serious journalist, gently spoken, courteous yet incisive. A classic Respected English Gentleman and as dull as ditchwater.
Jonathan Ross – the smirking popular presenter of a chat show, well-up on celebrity culture and recently got suspended for sending an offensive voicemail to a veteran actor on air. He is yobbish, but stylish edgy and cool.
One of them has to go – the BBC cannot afford the salaries of both. Which one?
Get rid of Ross – he commands an exorbitant salary for an amazingly cheap man.
Jonathan News
There was once an old king who wanted to hire a wealth coach to educate his princess on the subject of wealth intelligence to manage his wealth effectively in the event he dies. The generous king was willing to pay up to $1,000,000 for anyone who can fulfill his criteria for this 30 months project. The wise men all over the country heard about this handsome reward and many started applying for this job. All of the professional advisers started cracking their heads to propose many different strategies to make sure they land on the job. However, a young Wealth Coach called John approached the King differently. He said, “Almighty King, I can make sure I do an even better job compared to the rest of the people in the country yet I do not require a payment of $1,000,000. All I ask from you is to pay me 10 cents on the first month and double that amount of total income from the previous month every single month for the next 30 months.” The King thought about it and thought that he has landed the best deal ever and he agreed immediately to hire John. Towards the end of 30 months, the King’s Princess was an intelligent girl. The King was happy with John and he asked for the bill. To his surprise, the bill was $53,687,091.20! That day, the Princess learnt her biggest lesson ever. The whopping amount of bill was made happen because of the Power of Compounding!
The Einstein Way
When Albert Einstein discovered the Compound Interest Rule of 72, he said that compound interest is the Greatest Invention because it provides a Systematic Way of Increasing Wealth. You can ignore what Jonathan says but when this is said by Albert Einstein, I think it is worthwhile for you to sit up and listen.
What exactly is Rule of 72? Simply stated, it estimates how many years it would take for your money or debt to double.
All you have to do is simply divide the number 72 by the Annual Rate of Returns you get from you savings or investments.
Friend or Foe
Do remember that while Compound Interest can do wonders to your investment portfolio, it can do wonders to your Debts Portfolio as well. If you are paying 24% compound interest on your credit card debts, that also means that your debts double every 3 years. Therefore, if you have any credit card debts to clear, there are 2 very important points that you must always remember:
1) Constantly look for ways to lower your interest
2) Clear your credit card debts ASAP because it’s an obvious BAD DEBT!
You Can Retire a Millionaire
Many people may think that it’s quite impossible to retire with a million dollars if you are making less than $3,000 a month. Therefore, many of them would rather place their hopes on winning the lottery. The good news I have for you is that many of us can retire a millionaire with a discipline habit of savings. If you plan to retire at age 60
So, all you need to do is to start Increasing Your Wealth Intelligence by developing a discipline way of savings, start making your money work harder for you by getting better interest rate from your savings, and take advantage of the Power of Compounding!
If you enjoyed this article from Jonathan Quek and would like to receive more information on how to achieve a successful money mindset and learn personal excellence or wealth intelligence principles that really work, then please visit: www.Jonathan-Quek.com
Is it time for the Government to shut down Fox news?
‘Jonathan Zasloff, a law professor at UCLA, suggested that the federal government simply yank Fox off the air. “I hate to open this can of worms,” he wrote, “but is there any reason why the FCC couldn’t simply pull their broadcasting permit once it expires?” ‘
“I am genuinely scared” of Fox, wrote Guardian columnist Daniel Davies, because it “shows you that a genuinely shameless and unethical media organisation *cannot* be controlled by any form of peer pressure or self-regulation, and nor can it be successfully cold-shouldered or ostracised. In order to have even a semblance of control, you need a tough legal framework.”
http://lonelyconservative.com/2010/07/more-from-journolist-hoping-for-rush-limbaughs-death-and-government-shut-down-of-fox-news/
http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/21/liberal-journalists-suggest-government-shut-down-fox-news/2/
Sure, but they won’t…Too lucritive. However, most sane people don’t watch Fox. It’s kind of a running gag…
CTV NEWS – Jonathan Emile – National & Local News
